3 ms·

Are those who would be against polyamorous marriage a "hate group"?

• deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
• Karunamon 13y ago
  Irrelevant.
  • hackinthebochs 13y ago
    Its relevant as it reveals your rationale for defining "hate group" as suspect if you aren't willing to apply that same label to this hypothetical.
    • Karunamon 13y ago
      I'm not about to go off into the weeds with you on a completely separate topic that I swear every single anti-equality person jumps to as a matter of course. Views on equal marriage rights are completely irrelevant to how many people a person should be able to marry - the concerns raised are completely different both on a sociological and a legal level. This conversation is over.
      • MrZongle2 13y ago
        This conversation is over. Well, now that's a terribly effective argument.
• rimantas 13y ago
  How about interracial marriage instead? Double standards are appaling in this case. I've just read Marco's http://www.marco.org/2014/04/04/political-views http://www.marco.org/2014/04/04/political-views and I think he hits the nail on the head.
  • hackinthebochs 13y ago
    I don't find the comparison all that revealing. Clearly, there is no substantive difference between races. However, there are a few obvious substantive differences between genders, and these differences might lead one to a different belief regarding marriage. A belief in outlawing interracial marriage necessarily comes from hateful beliefs. A belief regarding gay marriage doesn't necessarily come from hate/homophobia.
    • cube_yellow 13y ago
      > Clearly, there is no substantive difference between races. http://jaymans.wordpress.com/hbd-fundamentals/ http://jaymans.wordpress.com/hbd-fundamentals/
      • hackinthebochs 13y ago
        I should clarify: substantive differences within this context. I don't deny that there are differences.