An interesting tactic Bell (in Canada) has done recently is explicitly add a fee for canceling if the contract conditions change. Generally, terms will say tha

An interesting tactic Bell (in Canada) has done recently is explicitly add a fee for canceling if the contract conditions change. Generally, terms will say that the contract may change from time to time, and it's left up to the reader to make the logical jump that a material change means they can cancel without penalty. Bell's terms now expressly say that the only way you can object to terms changing is by discontinuing your service, for which you will have to pay the normal ETFs. I don't think this has been tested in court, but it sure seems like it stinks.