4 ms·
>> Cycling is actually not that healthy. As someone who works out regularly but never cycles, this seems difficult to believe. Surely the cardiovascular benef
by Hannan 13y ago
>> Cycling is actually not that healthy.
As someone who works out regularly but never cycles, this seems difficult to believe. Surely the cardiovascular benefits outweigh any negatives from "muscle shortening" (first I've heard of this) compared to no activity.
Unless your point is "some types of exercise are better than cycling" in which case, sure.
- oznathan 13y agoAccuracy is so important in HN :) Fact - cycling creates short leg muscles, hamstrings in particular. For those of us who have tight hamstrings, which is most males (according to my subjective, biased observations), this is not good. Creates back problems later on. I agree that some cycling is better than no activity. But I would say that going to a hooker every night is also better for you health wise than staying in and watching tv, as long as you wear at least 2 condoms.
- noarchy 13y agoAs someone who has put in tens of thousands of km's on bicycles over the years, I'm wondering when these alleged downsides are supposed to kick in. According to my own subjective, self-observations, it has done nothing but good for me.
- oznathan 13y agoIn exactly 137 days.
- ZoF 13y agoPrecisely the type of backwards-ass opinion based upon flawed anecdotal evidence I love to see! Keep it up champ!
- hatu 13y agoSince we're nitpicking - wearing two condoms is a terrible idea. The friction will break them.