5 ms·
I will not get angry at a context-free headline urging me to do so. I may get slightly annoyed that this kind of sensationalism stands here however.
by skorgu 17y ago
I will not get angry at a context-free headline urging me to do so. I may get slightly annoyed that this kind of sensationalism stands here however.
- alex_c 17y agoI haven't read Reddit in a while, so the headline just confused me. (AT&T is getting angry? Or it's afraid of angry class action suits?)
- semiquaver 17y ago>context-free headline S -> NP.VP NP -> AT&T VP -> ADV.V ADV -> really | totally | clearly | ADV,.ADV | ε V -> sucks | is evil | hates consumers
- ryanwaggoner 17y agoI may just be really out of it and missing something obvious...but WTF?
- philwelch 17y agoHe's defining a context-free grammar for sensationalistic news headlines about AT&T. It's an elaborate pun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_grammar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_grammar for more information.