3 ms·
Not wishing to put words in the mouths of the creators, but there are a few reasons why one might target 2.7 rather than 3.x: 1. 2.7 is a stable target. There
by duggan 13y ago
Not wishing to put words in the mouths of the creators, but there are a few reasons why one might target 2.7 rather than 3.x:
1. 2.7 is a stable target. There will be no further features added to the 2.x series.
2. 2.7 is a known target. Other experiments like PyPy have already tried many paths to improve 2.7, so what doesn't work is reasonably well known.
3. 2.7 is a widely deployed target. This is less important from an "adoption" point of view, more so that there is a lot of software written that targets 2.x, meaning there's more software to test with.
4. Finally, I suspect much of Dropbox's codebase is 2.7[1], and since this is an effort to improve things for Dropbox, it makes sense to spend the initial efforts there :)
[1] checking the version of Python bundled with the Dropbox client confirms that it, at least, is 2.7
/Applications/Dropbox.app/Contents/MacOS/python --version
Python 2.7.3
- sanxiyn 13y ago1 is a big item. It is not fun playing catchup. CPython actually suspended any "language change" from 2009 to 2011 so that alternative implementations can catch up.
- stormbrew 13y agoOn the other hand, starting behind just means you have even more catching up to do. This happened in my personal VM project with ruby. I targeted ruby 1.8.7 when all these things held true for it, but by the time I got to it running most of the rubyspec language specs, 1.8.7 was basically obsolete.