4 ms·

Who said it was the wrong thing to do? You wrote: "He made a very public post saying, I'm happy to discuss my views - reach out to me and I'm happy to do it in

by dnr 13y ago

Who said it was the wrong thing to do? You wrote: "He made a very public post saying, I'm happy to discuss my views - reach out to me and I'm happy to do it in private." That is a severe mis-characterization of what he said, and I pointed out your error. I agree that him debating pseudonymous internet commentators, or even engaging in private email threads with interested but unknown people, would be counterproductive. Given his seeming unwillingness to change his views, there's nothing better he could have done. -- I'll note that the tone of what he wrote (e.g. saying "if you have good-faith assumptions" as if most people who disagree with him wouldn't) comes off to me as a one-sided offer. It reads like "if you want me to explain my beliefs and let me try to change your mind about why they're so bad, then let's talk". There's no willingness to accept that he might be wrong, no "I'd like to give you an opportunity to change my mind". Perhaps that's reading into it slightly, though.

victorhooi 13y ago
Hmm, wait, so you're saying that somebody doesn't have good-faith assumptions, and they want to have a reasonable adult conversation with him? Or perhaps you have a different definition of what "good faith" means? For example, WIkipedia say: > In philosophy, the concept of good faith (Latin: bona fides, or bona fide for "in good faith") denotes sincere, honest intention or belief, regardless of the outcome of an action; the opposed concepts are bad faith, mala fides (duplicity) and perfidy (pretense). The way I read it is, if you honestly want to have a discussion - which means two minds coming together and having a dialogue, and both parties will hear out the other side - then I will be happy to talk. If your'e going to be a dick, and just bait him, then he'd rather not. How is that not reasonable? Unless you have another source for a definition of good faith?

by dnr 13y ago

victorhooi 13y ago

Hmm, wait, so you're saying that somebody doesn't have good-faith assumptions, and they want to have a reasonable adult conversation with him? Or perhaps you have a different definition of what "good faith" means? For example, WIkipedia say: > In philosophy, the concept of good faith (Latin: bona fides, or bona fide for "in good faith") denotes sincere, honest intention or belief, regardless of the outcome of an action; the opposed concepts are bad faith, mala fides (duplicity) and perfidy (pretense). The way I read it is, if you honestly want to have a discussion - which means two minds coming together and having a dialogue, and both parties will hear out the other side - then I will be happy to talk. If your'e going to be a dick, and just bait him, then he'd rather not. How is that not reasonable? Unless you have another source for a definition of good faith?