Fair agument, I did not think that through. Mozilla is, of course, required to comply with any and all anti-discriminiation laws which apply. However, would I

Fair agument, I did not think that through. Mozilla is, of course, required to comply with any and all anti-discriminiation laws which apply. However, would I be correct in saying that his rights are not being infringed by having people (both internal and external to Mozilla) call for his resignation because of his beliefs, and his contributions to causes which are actively damaging to some of those in the community? Especially in the case of Mozilla, who rely heavily on volunteers, the opinions of those connected but not necessarily employed by Mozilla should be important.