4 ms·

They already have some things from their catalog digitized. e.g. http://www.mss.vatlib.it/guii/scan/link.jsp http://www.mss.vatlib.it/guii/scan/link.jsp http:

• ryannevius 13y ago
  Awesome! Do you have any idea what licensing / re-use / fair use of this content is? For example, would I be able to take these scans and build a digital product (e.g. web / desktop app) around them? Could I print one out and put it on a t-shirt? Etc. Something tells me "definitely not"...but I wasn't able to find anything conclusive on the site.
  • jonah 13y ago
    They site footer has a copyright notice. I'd say contact them - they may be open for non-commercial use.
  • earksiinni 13y ago
    You can get copies from the Archives for research purposes but it isn't cheap. I forget how much it cost when I was last there doing research. Also, they probably wouldn't grant permission for the purpose of making t-shirts, just my guess...=)
• kimmel 13y ago
  They are watermarking scans of items that are not in copyright since they predate the copyright system. What kind of bullshit is this? These should all be public domain. Is there anyone besides Google and the Vatican that watermark public domain works?
  • rmc 13y ago
    It is debateable whether or not scanning a public domain book allows you to claim copyright on it. Alas. Some of the early maps of Ireland (from 1840s) have been scanning and rectified and put online by the Ordenance Survey of Ireland. But they're all copyrighted by them, and you can't have them. (they're viewable here http://maps.osi.ie/ http://maps.osi.ie/ )
  • fhars 13y ago
    The reproduction itself is still a protected work, but you are free to reproduce the content if you copy it from the original or a reproduction that is no longer protected (i.e. older than 50 years in most jurisdictions I know about).
    • rmc 13y ago
      So all you need is to get access to a 1,000 year old book. Sure real easy.
    • pandesmos 13y ago
      I don't believe so. INAL but if the photograph attempts to exactly replicate an image I'm pretty sure copyright doesn't hold. So like, a high resolution image of a Caravaggio is still usable as public domain.[0] I'm pretty sure the Vatican's got to "ruin" the images with a watermark or anyone would be able to use them as is for whatever they want. It'd be different if it was sculpture, but these pics seem to me like they'd definitely fall into the "slavish reproduction of a public domain work" category. [0] http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/public-domain/welcome/#dear_rich_she_wants_to_use_bloch_paintings_on_tv http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/public-domain/welcome/#...
      • dragonwriter 13y ago
        Er, why are we looking at reference on US copyright law here? The State of Vatican City is not a US jurisdiction, and it has its own copyright law (which incorporates, to the extent that it is not preempted by the special laws promulgated by the Vatican, the copyright law of Italy.)
  • ternaryoperator 13y ago
    Scans are photographs. Sad, but true, in this particular case.
  • Kliment 13y ago
    The Getty museum used to do that (and be very aggressive about anyone using the old images) until recently. They have since pulled their collective heads out of their collective asses and allowed public access and relatively free use. Other museums still do this kind of senseless protective stuff regularly.