> I guess if they consider any other candidates for CEO from California, they'll have to ask them how they voted. Interesting. The difference between which bo

> I guess if they consider any other candidates for CEO from California, they'll have to ask them how they voted. Interesting. The difference between which box you check, and giving money to influence other people to check a certain box. The privacy of the former is a nearly-sacred privilege, while the latter is not allowed to be private. And I do tend to agree with campaign finance disclosure, but the double-standard is interesting. To be consistent, will we have to make all voting records public? Would there be outrage if there were political questionnaires for employment/promotion like this? If proof of lying was found, would there be more outrage over the lie; or over violating privacy to find out about the lie?