When they complain about having to get the data by hand, I assumed they were crawling through at least hundreds of profiles. Instead, it's just 35. If I had to

When they complain about having to get the data by hand, I assumed they were crawling through at least hundreds of profiles. Instead, it's just 35. If I had to guess, that's also a contributing reason as to why the first bar chart is in %, it masks how laughably small their sample is. Just because those founders have companies that went on to $1billion+ doesn't make them disproportionately significant in a statistical sense. Although it feels like they try to imply that with "disproportionately influential dataset".