2 ms·

I meant compare as balance, equate. but I'm sure you understood that you pedantic ass.

by moo 13y ago

Crito 13y ago
I am not being pedantic, I have genuine concern about blanket objections to comparisons to Hitler or the Nazis. Obviously nobody was actually equating Cuba with the Nazis. Nobody in this discussion believes that Castro is ordering the extermination of millions. Nobody in here believes that Castro wants a land war with Russia, wants to invade Poland, or has any particularly threatening military aspirations. Nobody in this discussion even believes that Castro and Hitler are even as evil or morally bankrupt as each other, despite the obvious geographic, temporal, political, or military differences. You of course know all of this. The comparison that was actually made was drawing attention to perceived similarities between defenses that are mounted or have been mounted for Mussolini and Castro. (Namely, pointing out that despite all the other bad things that have been said about [subject], at least [subject] excels in one particular way. The person who made drew attention to this perceived similarity perceives a similarity because they believe the "particular way" that the subject excels is of little relative consequence in the grand scheme of all of [subject]'s actions). I could just as easily compare my ex-boss to Mussolini: "Say what you want about [REDACTED], at least he came in to work on time." In this case my "defense" of my ex boss is actually an sarcastic quip that is meant to be critical. However obviously I am not balancing or equating an ex boss to a 20th century Fascist.
- moo 13y ago
  Having a train arrive on time does not equate to getting needed medical care, or having survival rights put ahead of someone else's property rights. I was not building a defencse for Cuba. I was correcting Morgante's implied point that Cuban people's well-being requires immediate action, like they are dying. On the contrary their health is much better than surrounding or any third world conditions. I corrected that. Then I'm marked as an appologist, comparable to defending hitler and mussolini which is nonsense. I don't see Cuba as a paradise. I don't see Cuba as needing to be villified as a dictatorship either when that is all what the U.S. sets up around the world. So the U.S. kidnaps Haiti's Aristide, and the place is still corrupt, still a basket case. Running to the West like the Ukraine coup plotters did does not fix things when fascists are running amuck and you are in debt with the IMF up to your ears. The freedom the U.S. govt wants for these countries is the freedom to destabilize them and once they have "our bastards" in place they look away like with Saudi Arabia, Columbia, Honduras, and Libya and people like you quickly stop squaking about freedom.

I meant compare as balance, equate. but I'm sure you understood that you pedantic ass.

by moo 13y ago

I meant compare as balance, equate. but I'm sure you understood that you pedantic ass.

Crito 13y ago

I am not being pedantic, I have genuine concern about blanket objections to comparisons to Hitler or the Nazis. Obviously nobody was actually equating Cuba with the Nazis. Nobody in this discussion believes that Castro is ordering the extermination of millions. Nobody in here believes that Castro wants a land war with Russia, wants to invade Poland, or has any particularly threatening military aspirations. Nobody in this discussion even believes that Castro and Hitler are even as evil or morally bankrupt as each other, despite the obvious geographic, temporal, political, or military differences. You of course know all of this. The comparison that was actually made was drawing attention to perceived similarities between defenses that are mounted or have been mounted for Mussolini and Castro. (Namely, pointing out that despite all the other bad things that have been said about [subject], at least [subject] excels in one particular way. The person who made drew attention to this perceived similarity perceives a similarity because they believe the "particular way" that the subject excels is of little relative consequence in the grand scheme of all of [subject]'s actions). I could just as easily compare my ex-boss to Mussolini: "Say what you want about [REDACTED], at least he came in to work on time." In this case my "defense" of my ex boss is actually an sarcastic quip that is meant to be critical. However obviously I am not balancing or equating an ex boss to a 20th century Fascist.

moo 13y ago
Having a train arrive on time does not equate to getting needed medical care, or having survival rights put ahead of someone else's property rights. I was not building a defencse for Cuba. I was correcting Morgante's implied point that Cuban people's well-being requires immediate action, like they are dying. On the contrary their health is much better than surrounding or any third world conditions. I corrected that. Then I'm marked as an appologist, comparable to defending hitler and mussolini which is nonsense. I don't see Cuba as a paradise. I don't see Cuba as needing to be villified as a dictatorship either when that is all what the U.S. sets up around the world. So the U.S. kidnaps Haiti's Aristide, and the place is still corrupt, still a basket case. Running to the West like the Ukraine coup plotters did does not fix things when fascists are running amuck and you are in debt with the IMF up to your ears. The freedom the U.S. govt wants for these countries is the freedom to destabilize them and once they have "our bastards" in place they look away like with Saudi Arabia, Columbia, Honduras, and Libya and people like you quickly stop squaking about freedom.