You are making three claims here: 1) That technology replaces jobs. 2) That there is a vast untapped well of jobs that will be created as Point 1 progresses.

You are making three claims here: 1) That technology replaces jobs. 2) That there is a vast untapped well of jobs that will be created as Point 1 progresses. 3) That the number of jobs in Point 2 is greater the number of jobs in Point 1. Disagreeing with Points 2 or 3 doesn't make someone a neo-Luddite. Those claims are more about the economy than about technology. I haven't seen any reason to accept them as true. Obviously some new jobs will open up, but the idea that there is a sufficient pool of jobs that are worth a comfortable wage isn't in evidence as far as I can tell.