3 ms·
..and the right-wing juntas up and down latin america were subsidized by the US. Cuba still did better. You could say, "But that's not a fair comparison, the
by jbooth 13y ago
..and the right-wing juntas up and down latin america were subsidized by the US. Cuba still did better.
You could say, "But that's not a fair comparison, the USSR subsidized things that actually helped people in Cuba while the US only funded commando death squads and fruit exporters, of course Cuba had a higher standard of living".. at which point I'd ask you to review what you just wrote.
- crusso 13y agoWow, a "preemptive strike straw man". You don't see that every day. :)
- jbooth 13y agoApparently you feel obligated to disagree with my substance, but had to settle for attacking my writing style. It wasn't pre-emptive or a straw man -- the poster had just (not pre-emptive) said that living standards were an unfair comparison due to USSR subsidies to Cuba (not a strawman), which is a fair point. I just pointed out that the US supported it's pet governments as well, and contrasted the USSR's approach with the USA's. Ever read that book 'The Ugly American' back in the day? Great read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ugly_American https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ugly_American
- crusso 13y agoApparently you want to disagree with my point Jeez, another straw man. Are they really necessary? Actually I do think that Cuba has been tragically mishandled by the US. I would have thought that trading with them and being a good example of Freedom for them would have been much better than trying to punish the dictators with perpetual embargo. That said, I sympathize with Cuban refugees who are furious with the mistreatment of dissidents and want the US government to continue a hard line against Cuba.
- jbooth 13y agoIt's pretty rare for someone to come in pointing out flaws in an argument they agree with. You say that you did agree with me, so my apologies for attributing that view to you.