4 ms·
> Of course plyr is ridiculously slow and can't be used for even modest-sized data sets. Right and that's what dplyr is supposed to fix. The benchmarks so far
by craigching 13y ago
> Of course plyr is ridiculously slow and can't be used for even modest-sized data sets.
Right and that's what dplyr is supposed to fix. The benchmarks so far mark it at roughly the same performance as data.table. But, as you said, it's early days for dplyr ;) Thanks for your comments!