3 ms·
If feature status were a Facebook relationship status, many might say "it's complicated." ;-) Most of the time, it's not actually a question of engineering reso
by JacobRossi 13y ago
If feature status were a Facebook relationship status, many might say "it's complicated." ;-) Most of the time, it's not actually a question of engineering resources. Stay tuned as we update more and more stuff to "In Development".
(I work for IE)
- geetee 13y agoFor what it's worth, it does look like things are moving in the right direction, so I hope the trend continues!
- derefr 13y agoI'm curious--does this imply internal-politics problems (e.g. getting other departments to expose, and possibly backport, APIs that Chakra needs to consume to do the features), or just weird engineering challenges specific to the Chakra codebase?
- TheCoreh 13y agoI could see some conflicts of interest issues too. (e.g. implementing WebRTC could be against their interests - since Microsoft owns Skype, they might not want to lower the barrier of entry to a competitor.)
- dstorey 13y agoMicrosoft are contributing to Object RTC, so I see this as unlikely.
- Joeri 13y agoIn the past when they've spoken about why they delayed implementation it was often due to security issues (e.g. Webgl) or due to the standards proposal not being mature enough and them being worried that supporting it would lock in a bad version of the spec because people would build code on top.