3 ms·
I don't really think adding in the start menu is the answer. I've been using Win 8 since release candidate and, although I was annoyed at first, I soon grew to
by wambotron 13y ago
I don't really think adding in the start menu is the answer. I've been using Win 8 since release candidate and, although I was annoyed at first, I soon grew to enjoy the new UX.
When I use Win 7 now, the thing that annoys me the most is that damn start menu. It's clunky and feels like a chore to navigate through. In Win 8, you can switch over to the metro screen with the Win key, start typing and BAM. OR you can win+q and start typing while you're in desktop mode.
I never use metro, so I can't really talk about that. I'm not on a touch device for my desktop, though.
I think MS just has a reputation for being "slow" and "clunky," despite the reality that it's a blazing fast OS and, once you adjust to the new UX, a really nice workflow.
Just my 2¢.
- penguin42 13y agoDo people not realize you can "hit win key and start typing" in windows 7 too? I haven't clicked on "all programs" in months. It does seem they made the type-to-search faster/more comprehensive in win 8. But there's no need for that to be full screen. A win 7 style start menu with win 8 style search is the best of both worlds.
- wambotron 13y agoIt's definitely not the same search
- JennyZ 13y agoIndeed, whereas in the start menu you could just search and press enter if the only result was a file to open it, with the start screen you will get a metro app showing results when you do do the same. I hate the full screen switch, I have 2 monitors and at least 2 apps visible on both, I don't want something to go full screen and hide everything I'm working with. I'm using classicshell and I'll probably keep using it after this update. Also sidenote: could they bring aero back as an option at least? I have a desktop with a mid-end graphics card, I really would like my desktop to not look worse than windows 95 did...
- zaroth 13y agoWhat is there "to navigate through"? In Win7, press start and type. At least the whole screen doesn't puke on you when you do it. I don't think I've clicked that 'All Programs' button in years. But more realistically, all the apps I want to run are always already running. There's nothing for me to "Start". If not for installing security updates, my system uptime would be several years. What I actually want is major improvements to Alt-Tab. The most frustrating thing is how it frequently screws up the z-order when I'm switching back and forth between multiple apps. It seems to forget where I came from, and a single Alt-Tab sends me to the wrong place. The window 'latching' and Win-<arrow> shortcuts they adding in Win7 does help a bit with this, but doesn't obviate the need for much better Alt-Tab. I think the second major flaw is, just because I happen to have 10 different excel sheets, 10 PPTs, 10 notepads "open", does not mean each one needs its own blank square in the Alt-Tab view. They figured out how to stack properly in the taskbar, but it didn't translate to the Alt-Tab view? The concepts of "open" and "running" seem quite outdated to me. Assume everything is "open", everything is "running", and I don't need to "Start" anything. But I do need good tools to context switch and organize multiple windows across multiple screens. A full screen of identical looking icons is NOT the best solution, IMO.
- wambotron 13y agoI don't think metro itself is very good, and, like I said, I don't use it. I use Win+Q for searching (much like I use CMD+space on mac) and never even open the metro interface. I agree with you that the start menu and the idea of running/open are outdated.