If you take the remaining Mozilla leadership's explanations at face value -- there is no problem and Eich is most qualified -- then of course there is no proble

If you take the remaining Mozilla leadership's explanations at face value -- there is no problem and Eich is most qualified -- then of course there is no problem, but let's look a little deeper: 1) If the resignations were long planned, where are their successors? 2) The directors who resigned are experienced leaders; they must be aware of the perception when, * They resign en masse immediately before the appointment of a new CEO * The majority of the board has resigned before a big decision * The board is reduced to 2 people, one of whom is co-founder with the new CEO It smells like a power struggle between the founders and other board members. Whether that is true or not, a big part of the leadership's job is public perception and they are responsible for the image they project. Could it really be an unfortunate coincidence? 3) Eich himself now says that existence of Mozilla is at stake if he is forced out (I'm not exaggerating; he repeats it many times in this interview): http://www.cnet.com/news/mozilla-ceo-gay-marriage-firestorm-could-hurt-firefox-cause-q-a/ http://www.cnet.com/news/mozilla-ceo-gay-marriage-firestorm-... If that is the case and Mozilla is at risk, then shouldn't Eich resign? It almost seems that he conflates his ambitions with Mozilla, or that he is holding Mozilla hostage (don't criticize me or I'll take down Mozilla with me), or that he thinks he is irreplaceable. Whatever is going on, it doesn't look good and I wish Mozilla would do more than issue bland explanations.