3 ms·
Well there's a little more physics to it, namely that biases towards certain distributions are small -- i.e. that systems always have paths to a large number of
by darkmighty 13y ago
Well there's a little more physics to it, namely that biases towards certain distributions are small -- i.e. that systems always have paths to a large number of states. The laws of physics has to be such that they exhibit asymptotic equipartition.
In your example, assuming that particles positions are iid over the entire container generates the second law, but only because the dynamics of the system allow such approximation -- imagine instead that particles liked to almost irreversibly "stick together", then the system would converge to most particles on a single side.
- ThePhysicist 13y agoYeah that's true of course and why I assumed they are non-interacting. It's of course a gross simplification of the real theory but it explains quite well why entropy increases in a closed system and as an explanation is not conceptually wrong.