3 ms·
That would explain it. It's remarkable how ambiguous TOSs in general are. I can see from a business perspective how Github was probably pressured from outside s
by cantbecool 13y ago
That would explain it. It's remarkable how ambiguous TOSs in general are. I can see from a business perspective how Github was probably pressured from outside source, MPAA, to remove the application that could be used as a conduit to illegally download magnet links. This is such a slippery slope though...
- maxerickson 13y agoI would say the terms are one sided (at least on this issue). I don't think they are ambiguous. I don't think it is really a slippery slope either, there would be a bunch of new law needed to make it so that offering a platform for publication carried the obligation to publish things (a lot of it focused on protecting the service provider from liability).
- otikik 13y agoThis particular TOS part is not ambiguous. It means "we can delete anything".