3 ms·
Close, but it is not poor design choice. It is actually an issue with accessibility. http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist http://webaim.org/standards/508/
by leovander 13y ago
Close, but it is not poor design choice. It is actually an issue with accessibility.
http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist
- vidarh 13y agoNothing on that checklist precludes javascript-only applications. In fact, the checklist specifically points out that "noscript" content does not constitute a suitable alternative to inaccessible scripting - the solution is to ensure the scripted solution is accessible (e.g. no mouse-only functionality for example).