Well, then change those 1,138 statutory provisions. Just remove the word "marriage" from the mix and replace it with, eg. "registered union" or something, and b

Well, then change those 1,138 statutory provisions. Just remove the word "marriage" from the mix and replace it with, eg. "registered union" or something, and be done with the discussion. Everyone would have the same right. The things would be much easier if we just stopped redefining common words with new meaning to suit someone's agenda. Marriage was always, at least in western culture a relation between a man and a woman. If you want that gay people have the same legal benefits as hetero couples, do it the right way, but don't try to force everyone that "marriage" should now have different meaning. I have the same issue against FSF redefining the meaning of "free" in software world and pretending that they have right to force their meaning of the word to everyone else. They don't. And, btw, about that "registered union" that should replace "marriage" in legal documents ... just don't limit the number of people in there. Better yet, don't limit it only to people. Why wouldn't someone be allowed to "marry" or "register" a goat, if he likes so? And please, also drop age limits. Why wouldn't 13 year old girl have a right to "marry" another 45 years old woman, 52 years old man and their 4 years old horse? We should all have the same right, without any restrictions? Right?