4 ms·

Here's the problem. Eich is free to believe whatever he wants. Prop 8 is trying to enforce those beliefs on those who believe differently. That's where the prob

by nathanb 13y ago

Here's the problem. Eich is free to believe whatever he wants. Prop 8 is trying to enforce those beliefs on those who believe differently. That's where the problem comes in. Religious fundamentalism (from more than one religion) teaches that homosexuality is as wrong as, say, rape. But the latter hurts another, while the former does not. In my mind, that's where the line is drawn. I have my own personal beliefs. I am glad to live in a country that supports these beliefs. I do not try to use the legal system to force others to follow my beliefs.

yummyfajitas 13y ago
Prop 8 is trying to enforce those beliefs on those who believe differently. That's where the problem comes in. All laws enforce the beliefs of the lawmakers on those who believe differently. Much like homosexuality, consuming marijuana, drugs not approved by the FDA, failing to purchase health insurance, and paying below minimum wage all fall into the category of acts that don't hurt another. Do you oppose all such laws?
- iSnow 13y ago
  >paying below minimum wage all fall into the category of acts that don't hurt another Could you elaborate on that?
tomcorrigan 13y ago
Do you support polygamy? Should minors be allowed to marry? I don't care either way what your answers are to the above questions, but understand that if you say no to either then you are joining the majority in imposing your belief on a minority. In the first case there can be no reasonable justification for such a belief except that you believe in "traditional marriage." Perhaps that is what Brendan Eich believes in too?
- nathanb 13y ago
  I support removing the definition of marriage from the lawbooks entirely. I really don't see why the government should be in the business of telling people what is and is not a valid marriage. I realize that my point got a little lost in my example. I was just trying to provide context for Dolimiter to explain why there's a distinction between Eich telling homosexuals they can't marry (from the article's perspective, this is wrong) and people telling Eich that he shouldn't act on his beliefs in this way. They are not equal-and-opposite forms or repression.

by nathanb 13y ago

yummyfajitas 13y ago

Prop 8 is trying to enforce those beliefs on those who believe differently. That's where the problem comes in. All laws enforce the beliefs of the lawmakers on those who believe differently. Much like homosexuality, consuming marijuana, drugs not approved by the FDA, failing to purchase health insurance, and paying below minimum wage all fall into the category of acts that don't hurt another. Do you oppose all such laws?

iSnow 13y ago
>paying below minimum wage all fall into the category of acts that don't hurt another Could you elaborate on that?

tomcorrigan 13y ago

Do you support polygamy? Should minors be allowed to marry? I don't care either way what your answers are to the above questions, but understand that if you say no to either then you are joining the majority in imposing your belief on a minority. In the first case there can be no reasonable justification for such a belief except that you believe in "traditional marriage." Perhaps that is what Brendan Eich believes in too?

nathanb 13y ago
I support removing the definition of marriage from the lawbooks entirely. I really don't see why the government should be in the business of telling people what is and is not a valid marriage. I realize that my point got a little lost in my example. I was just trying to provide context for Dolimiter to explain why there's a distinction between Eich telling homosexuals they can't marry (from the article's perspective, this is wrong) and people telling Eich that he shouldn't act on his beliefs in this way. They are not equal-and-opposite forms or repression.