3 ms·
see also https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3650/historical-reasons-for-adoption-of-turing-machine-as-primary-model-of-computatio/3680#3680 https://cs
by hyp0 13y ago
see also https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3650/historical-reasons-for-adoption-of-turing-machine-as-primary-model-of-computatio/3680#3680 https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3650/historical...
It's interesting that Turing never rigorously proved Turing Machines were a model of computation, it was only an intuitive appeal. He actually apologised for this when introducing them, in his Entscheidungsproblem paper
http://www.turingarchive.Entscheidungsproblemorg/browse.php/B/12 http://www.turingarchive.Entscheidungsproblemorg/browse.php/...
Also curious is that Church wrote to him, saying that he found Turing's model more intuitively convincing.
Intuitive appeal isn't everything of course.
- mafribe 13y agoThe reason why he did not there was no rigorous proof is probably in parts that the result is not controversial at all.