3 ms·
> Edited for clarity. I prefer the original, overtly aggressive and unapologetically abusive version. At least with that we know where we stand.
by stefantalpalaru 13y ago
> Edited for clarity.
I prefer the original, overtly aggressive and unapologetically abusive version. At least with that we know where we stand.
- dang 13y agoThe original was: "This isn't Wikipedia. We prefer to think for ourselves here". My meaning was that we prefer to find solutions that are appropriate for HN rather than copying what another site does. Since my original wording left room for misunderstanding, I changed it. (I do that all the time, incidentally; I am a compulsive, inveterate editor, and always have been.) If that is what you call "unapologetically abusive", we have nothing further to discuss. I'm going to invest time answering users we have a hope of satisfying.