4 ms·
But they still wouldn't be illegal. No one would go to jail for being married. They just wouldn't be recognized by the state. That is way different than what O
by chomp 13y ago
But they still wouldn't be illegal. No one would go to jail for being married.
They just wouldn't be recognized by the state. That is way different than what OKCupid is trying to say.
- michaelhoffman 13y ago"Illegal" is not the same thing as "criminal."
- silencio 13y ago> No one would go to jail for being married. Well, Prop 8 specifically didn't try to do that, but that isn't unheard of in the US: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/10/indiana-gay-marriage-debate-state-laws/2504767/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/10/indiana... > They just wouldn't be recognized by the state. Okcupid may have worded that badly, but the problem doesn't go away because it changed from "illegal" to "refusal to recognize/allow". It's still fundamentally terrible. And yes, I recognize the difference between the two - I'm fully aware this country made interracial marriages like mine straight out illegal and not just unrecognized up until 50 years ago, and it's only been a week since I got married and I've already had to deal with thinly veiled racism.