Nor does it track what happened to the 1% from 30 years ago and whether they are even the same 1% today. Until this fact is acknowledged, they have no business

Nor does it track what happened to the 1% from 30 years ago and whether they are even the same 1% today. Until this fact is acknowledged, they have no business even bringing up numbers. Another possible point of confusion: Maybe the top 1% aren't merely wealthier, maybe the top .1% is more numerous. Wouldn't that be good news?