3 ms·
The emulation question is the main reason -- not the only reason, but the main reason -- I don't see Apple really moving in this direction with the Mac line any
by chipotle_coyote 13y ago
The emulation question is the main reason -- not the only reason, but the main reason -- I don't see Apple really moving in this direction with the Mac line any time soon. But I don't think it's just a matter of third-party software for OS X that's the issue; Windows compatibility is a pretty big deal. Apple doesn't push Macs as being great Windows machines currently (although they did for a while), but they're certainly aware of this use case and how it's been a minor but measurable plus for the Mac line. Even as much as Apple is known for burning down the old to make way for the new, I think they'd be pretty cautious with this one.
The notion that this CPU is really about giving ample power to the iOS line makes more sense to me. There will eventually be an "iPad Pro," whether or not it gets stuck with that moniker, and it won't have to worry about backward compatibility with anything other than previous iOS devices.
- kevinchen 13y agoI don't see low-end users (think entry-level MacBook Air) running virtualization or Boot Camp. The well-known Mac developers will recompile their apps as soon as Xcode is updated, and huge apps like Office will probably get a pre-release version beforehand. So a cheaper ARM MBA should be usable for most of it customers.