3 ms·
I use crosstool-ng to do the heavy lifting for me. [0] But lately I've been trying out musl-cross to get nice, self-contained static binaries. [1] [0]: http://
by jevinskie 13y ago
I use crosstool-ng to do the heavy lifting for me. [0] But lately I've been trying out musl-cross to get nice, self-contained static binaries. [1]
[0]: http://crosstool-ng.org/ http://crosstool-ng.org/
[1]: https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross
- Crito 13y agoCrosstool-ng is nice, but if you have even a mildly out of the ordinary arch/libc/kernel version/etc combination it is still a massive pain in the ass. Typically I'd rather build the kernel on device overnight instead of spend manhours getting crosstool-ng to work as I want so that I can build on beefy hardware. It tends to only be worth it if you are going to be using it more than a few times.
- astrodust 13y agoWouldn't an emulator actually be faster on high-end hardware? Then you can run native tools at much faster than Pi execution speed, right?