10 ms·

Sure, he might be innocent, but he really needs to put out a statement clarifying what his involvement was and what he knew. Mozilla should probably hire an in

by ig1 13y ago

Sure, he might be innocent, but he really needs to put out a statement clarifying what his involvement was and what he knew. Mozilla should probably hire an independent auditor to review all of his code changes. It might be unnecessary but this seems to be a scenario where it's better to play it safe (plus always good to audit security related code).

Consultant32452 13y ago
>Sure, he might be innocent, but he really needs to put out a statement clarifying what his involvement was and what he knew. Why does he need to do that? What benefit will it be to him? If he said he was unaware of any underhandedness would you believe him? Do you think that if he was aware that he wouldn't have signed NDAs about these things?