>Leaving aside the question of what a small cohort of randomly selected 16-to-18-year-olds This stood out for me as a very weak part of the article. Cite stud

>Leaving aside the question of what a small cohort of randomly selected 16-to-18-year-olds This stood out for me as a very weak part of the article. Cite studies and meta-studies that substantiate some relatively minor impact of porn on personal development and then turn around, toss the scientific way of thinking and take some random sample of teenagers in a non-controlled environment as the ultimate measurement.