4 ms·
And with the limits not only of ontologies, but of models in general. All models are wrong. Some are useful. As you pointed out, there is no such thing as a
by mattfenwick 13y ago
And with the limits not only of ontologies, but of models in general.
All models are wrong. Some are useful. As you pointed out, there is no such thing as a species in the real world -- it's just in the model that there's a species.
The model has been so successful that, unfortunately, it's treated as "true" by many people, which means that 1) they don't understand its limitations, and 2) they don't work to improve it.
+1, I'm glad you mentioned this.
- einhverfr 13y agoThe example that comes to my mind is Rosa gallica vs Rosa alba vs. Rosa damascena. Trying to understand why these are species rather than subspecies, given the ease of interbreeding (over many generations and hundreds of years), leads to very big headaches.