3 ms·
Ah, a band-aid on a band-aid. What was wrong with open outcry? Sure, you had to physically be there, but nothing has changed - traders still cluster around exc
by madaxe_again 13y ago
Ah, a band-aid on a band-aid.
What was wrong with open outcry? Sure, you had to physically be there, but nothing has changed - traders still cluster around exchanges to keep latency low, HFT kit still lives "on the floor", and what was once done with humans and bits of paper is now done in a far less efficient fashion with computers. Less, because the marginal benefit ends up going into the pockets of those who can afford exchange co-lo and mountains of hardware to parse FIX a tick faster than the other guy, meaning that the rest of the market ends up suffering, and not having a more efficient fill mechanism, as touted.
HFT is that asshole who takes his umbrella with him into the pit, and blocks your trades.
If anything, the solution here is to abolish algorithmic trading, and decrease tick resolution substantially, which if lengthened enough, would take C out of the question and make the entire market equally accessible to all.
I mean, seriously - does the value of Brent light sweet actually change thousands of times per second? According to the markets, yes, according to reality, where people buy futures with straddles/swaps so as to have a fixed, manageable cost, no.
The entire thing is un-necessary, and doesn't add value to humans.
- smoorman1024 13y agoThe most obvious and simplest thing wrong with open outcry and human market makers is the number of specialists that it takes to handle a full universe of stocks. A small electronic trading team can provide/take liquidity in 8000 stocks or greater. If you need specialists you are going to have to provide a living salary for every single specialist who will only be able to handle 20 stocks at most. The cost of trading for the end consumer is higher.
- madaxe_again 13y ago> The cost of trading for the end consumer is higher. What about when you factor in the artificially elevated buys and artificially depressed sells as a result of HFT?
- smoorman1024 13y agoWhat specifically are you referring to?
- madaxe_again 13y agoDid you read the article? :) Pre-emptive buys driving up the price across exchanges.
- aet 13y agoThe cost of trading is still drastically lower now than it was with open outcry. There were a number of federal indictments related to NYSE specialists blatently ripping off retail customers. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/13/business/13nyse.html http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/13/business/13nyse.html