If you found a proof that P != NP, you'd want to communicate it with the rest of the world. In doing so, you'd want to portray yourself in such a way that peop

If you found a proof that P != NP, you'd want to communicate it with the rest of the world. In doing so, you'd want to portray yourself in such a way that people don't think you're a crank. You'd speak in the standard style of prose that related CS papers use, you'd avoid the signs of a wrong proof as described at http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=458 http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=458 or explain why they don't apply here. You'd portray yourself as somebody that knows what they're doing. When it comes to the topic of secure and anonymous email, you haven't done that. You've done the opposite. There's about a 1 in 1000 chance that somebody writing the post you've made here is in any position to be writing this software. In particular, you don't predict questions people would have and address them beforehand. Your post leaves so much room for doubt, doubt that you should be aware of and have resolved yourself. You've also failed to address cjbprime's question in a way that suggests you have a realistic view of how the world works -- you didn't mention having a team member in Switzerland who's the only one that can access the server. That would be an essential fact, but you've omitted it. Whether it's true or false, you didn't know it was essential, and now it seems like you don't know what you're doing.