3 ms·
well, most open source projects have a small set of core developers, a larger set of testers (users who discover bugs and report them properly) and larger set o
by systems 13y ago
well, most open source projects have a small set of core developers, a larger set of testers (users who discover bugs and report them properly) and larger set of passive users
being more popular will only slighly enlarge the core, and keep it healthy (if a member drops, someone else comes in)
popularity is good for OOS projects ...
i also disagree that a larger community will increase the bad, again the core developer size will probably remain small enough to work coherently
more testers cannot be bad
more libraries can never be bad, it will just increase the likeleehood of having good ones happen
another reason for languages need for popularity is that it really take a lot of time and effort to master one
if you spend years mastering a tools, you sure want it to be popular for more years ... to get a chance to use this knowledge
- dllthomas 13y agoMore users means more people who feel breaking changes. If you have one user, and someone demands a change that might be breaking, there's a pretty good chance everyone who feels that is willing to go to the effort of fixing up any breakage. If you have ten million users and someone requests a change that might be breaking, you've got to treat it much more carefully.