5 ms·
To answer your last question, I think you are way-over-thinking the problem. But hey, I'm just one guy with an opinion. Personally, I don't know why I would ne
by apsurd 17y ago
To answer your last question, I think you are way-over-thinking the problem. But hey, I'm just one guy with an opinion.
Personally, I don't know why I would need all of the stuff you described just to make a decision. Think about it this way. If the decision was a significant one, it would be embedded in your thought process, you would not be able to forget about it. If it isn't, then there's no use spending all that time on it.
Anyway, Fogbugz comes to mind. It's not a decision maker per say, but its a tracker. I love fogbugz and actually the new version 7 allows you to easily add custom fields, so you can probably add some poll features. Fogbugz is good because the premise is simple. Track bugs so you don't forget about them, and collaborate with your team to manage the fix. Making decisions possibly has a similar worklflow. Check them out. Track bugs/Track decisions : Fogbugz!
- snitko 17y agoI didn't mean it's a tool to make one big decision. In that case, yes, it'd be natural to keep all the stuff you need in your mind. I meant that it's more like lots of small, but important decisions - as if you are approving YC applications. Imagine the flow of the applications they have and I guess it gets obvious that you need at least a set of rules to handle these.