That's kind of the point of the article: If it's easy to get it wrong in CoffeeScript, i.e. CoffeeScript has its own bad parts, then you're better off just lear

That's kind of the point of the article: If it's easy to get it wrong in CoffeeScript, i.e. CoffeeScript has its own bad parts, then you're better off just learning to deal with the bad parts in JavaScript directly.