Looking at your comments, you seem to prefer a more direct and assertive style of debate than is normal on here. So do I, but I've chosen to adjust because I've

Looking at your comments, you seem to prefer a more direct and assertive style of debate than is normal on here. So do I, but I've chosen to adjust because I've found that a harsh tone signals aggression to people here where in other contexts it instead signals passion for the idea. Or: I propose the hypothessis that your calibration for how other people are perceiving things is incorrect, and that if you adjust that, then while there's still a lower percentage for whom it's true than there used to be, on average people still value signal more than you do.