3 ms·
traceroute to 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2.525 ms 3.372 ms 8.410 ms 2 78.180.240.1.dyn
by gkya 13y ago
traceroute to 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2.525 ms 3.372 ms 8.410 ms
2 78.180.240.1.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr (78.180.240.1) 26.861 ms 28.677 ms 30.683 ms
3 81.212.78.13.static.turktelekom.com.tr (81.212.78.13) 32.834 ms 33.887 ms 34.726 ms
4 gayrettepe-t2-3-gayrettepe-t3-5.turktelekom.com.tr.205.212.81.in-addr.arpa (81.212.205.105) 36.738 ms 37.718 ms 39.747 ms
5 ulus-t2-3-gayrettepe-t2-3.turktelekom.com.tr.204.212.81.in-addr.arpa (81.212.204.205) 48.947 ms 49.867 ms 51.937 ms
6 ulus-t3-4-ulus-t2-3.turktelekom.com.tr.204.212.81.in-addr.arpa (81.212.204.149) 56.001 ms 27.122 ms 29.496 ms
7 * * *
...
30 * * *
8.8.8.8 gives similar (indeed identical if I've good eye-diff skills) output.
- jlgaddis 13y agoThanks, I found a TT LG in the meantime. Interestingly enough, it throws an error ("Please enter a valid IPv4/IPv6 address!") when I ask it for the routes it has for 8.8.4.0/24 or 8.8.8.0/24. If I ask for 8.8.33.0/24 (the "closest" subnet I see in my own BGP tables), it responds normally.
- askbjoernhansen 13y agoIt'd be easier for them to announce the /32, I'd think.
- jlgaddis 13y agoRight, I'm sure they are (they pretty much have to, unless they want to make it harder on themselves)... there's no reason they'd need to filter the /24s out, unless they're afraid that maybe Google would start using other IPs in the same /24 to help the Turks bypass it or something.