3 ms·
I upvoted a story on the new feed about the Inmarsat's approach to estimating the missing Malaysian plane's location that I found highly informative. Hours late
by tunap 13y ago
I upvoted a story on the new feed about the Inmarsat's approach to estimating the missing Malaysian plane's location that I found highly informative. Hours later that day when I noted the usual Telegraph mc-article rising up, not a single upvote on the better article(IMO) had been recorded. Perhaps it was a time delay as there is 1 upvote now. Shame, it seemed like the perfect article to elicit meaningful discussion on HN. Maybe Part 2 or Part 3 will someday...if they're proven correct, which is up for debate still.
HN post:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7430634 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7430634
DirectLink
http://www.airtrafficmanagement.net/2014/03/mh370-satcoms-101/ http://www.airtrafficmanagement.net/2014/03/mh370-satcoms-10...
- kbenson 13y agoI find that a comment as well as an upvote helps more. I'm more likely to check out a new article that has a comment, as there may be some discussion to be had, and I find the discussion the best part of the site.
- tunap 13y agoGood point. I bookmarked that one due to length and had to revisit it later when time allowed. I checked back to see how it's HN status fared and read some additional insights, the discussions often add new perspectives or are more substantive than the articles themselves. Checking the HN comments to ensure I don't inadvertently benefit a click-baiter is very useful, too.