Their sense of duty and loyalty to the organization, or legal obligations, may prevent them from making any statements. They don't "have to" say anything. (I'

Their sense of duty and loyalty to the organization, or legal obligations, may prevent them from making any statements. They don't "have to" say anything. (I'd have to guess there's more going on than even controversy over inside/outside candidates. The departure of the prior CEO seemed a bit abrupt. Management of a non-profit has special challenges, without the normal shareholder influences or reductionist profit-making goals. That the Corp is technically a for-profit, but with a single non-profit shareholder, the Foundation, with its own separate board, just adds extra indirection to the challenges.)