5 ms·

"They did not want to be identified because they are not authorized to speak publicly about the matter." With Mozilla?

• kelnos 13y ago
  The "people familiar" with the matter (who presumably work for or are affiliated with Mozilla in some way) aren't authorized by Mozilla to speak publicly about the board member resignations.
  • yuhong 13y ago
    I know, why do they need authorization at an organization like Mozilla?
    • kelnos 13y ago
      Just because Mozilla has a culture of openness and transparency, it doesn't mean every piece of information about the goings-on of the company is public. I find that unsurprising and entirely normal.
      • yuhong 13y ago
        Yes, but I wonder exactly why in this particular case.
        • kelnos 13y ago
          I'm not particularly surprised. Details about board member resignations are often fairly sensitive. Agreed that it'd be nice to know the details, though.