3 ms·
Not really, I've played with one an the enclosure is pretty rigid. It flexes but it's not like you can fold it and half and then smooth it out. I'm still waitin
by devindotcom 13y ago
Not really, I've played with one an the enclosure is pretty rigid. It flexes but it's not like you can fold it and half and then smooth it out. I'm still waiting on that. Also the resolution leaves something to be desired at that size.
- derefr 13y agoWould the best analogy be something like a 5.25" floppy, where it wiggles a bit but bending it into a U-shape would wreck it?
- devindotcom 13y agoThis is much thicker than that. No, if I remember correctly it's really more like a large, thin hardback, like a children's book. Sorry I can't be more specific, I only held it for a few moments, and they could easily have altered the design or simply had an old prototype out.
- 6d0debc071 13y agoI suspect they meant flexible in the usability sense rather than in the physical sense :/
- Retric 13y agoHaving busted e readers before; being able to flex a little probably does wonders for it's survivability. Light weight + thin + rigid is just a dangerous combo.