3 ms·
Isn't $3.5 trillion per year slightly less than $111K per second?
by magoghm 13y ago
Isn't $3.5 trillion per year slightly less than $111K per second?
- level 13y agoOh, that makes it much easier to imagine.
- R_Edward 13y agoAw, dangit! That right there is why I should always double-check my mental math with a calculator. I should have said 20.45 minutes, not 1.## seconds. Mea culpa. It's still not a huge savings, comparatively.
- tonyhb 13y agoComparatively, bringing fiber to NYC won't be so expensive (considering the results). At this point, it's not about comparatively. Optimising $240m a year is so fucking good when it's a short switch. Low hanging fruit. How do you optimise your apps? "Oh, this 100ms optimisation that is a one-pointer is comparatively not worth it, let's not do it"?