>Pulitzer Prize by 2017 Isn't that a bit too ambitious? I admittedly don't know a lot about the Pulitzer Prize, but I'd assume the main qualities they're looki

>Pulitzer Prize by 2017 Isn't that a bit too ambitious? I admittedly don't know a lot about the Pulitzer Prize, but I'd assume the main qualities they're looking for in a journalist there are not 'fast', and 'factually correct'. The first one doesn't really relate to the quality of journalism, and the second one's just too basic a requirement. What I'd assume is worthy of a prize in journalism, is the data collection and investigation process before even starting to write the article. This would include very complex tasks, most covering social interaction, which I just can't see a computer outperforming a human in by 2017.