My post was addressed at your claim that "Once health is aside, so is sustainability." I believe that I it made clear that this is not the case. Your view is m

My post was addressed at your claim that "Once health is aside, so is sustainability." I believe that I it made clear that this is not the case. Your view is myopic and selfish, as it ignores the very real effects that a meat-eater diet has on other humans and the environment. I did not imply that health and lifespan are the same, and I even addressed them separately. My beliefs are based in well-documented evidence. Eating meat has a strong positive correlation with increased healthcare costs.[1] Whether or not meat has a negative impact on health only has a bearing on the costs of healthcare for meat-eaters, which is a minor point that I mentioned as an aside. It does not have a bearing on the environmental impacts of a meat-eater diet. You are nitpicking minor details of my post. Perhaps instead of vaguely implying that I'm mistaken you should produce evidence that contradicts me. [1] http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/2012/03/12/bad-news-for-red-meat-lovers/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/2012/03/12/bad-news-...