This is everything that is wrong with science journalism. The meta analysis made no control for dietary alternatives, and it is hard to argue that, given the s

This is everything that is wrong with science journalism. The meta analysis made no control for dietary alternatives, and it is hard to argue that, given the sociological factors involved (ie - middle americans), that the participants in the studies didn't simply replace their saturated fats with carbs. In other words, they just replaced an excess of one bad thing with an excess of another. There was an in depth article about this, that I can't seem to find now. If you know what I'm talking about, please post it.