Yes, I also noticed that. In every question the interviewer tries to make Bjarne acknowledge some sensationalistic crap. It looks like the interviewer is more i

Yes, I also noticed that. In every question the interviewer tries to make Bjarne acknowledge some sensationalistic crap. It looks like the interviewer is more interested in the political side of the story while Bjarne politely tells him he is wrong and then continues with the technical side. The result is a pretty good explanation despite the interviewer's persistent efforts to derail it.