3 ms·
I use both vendors' toolsets, have found occasional bugs in both, have my regrets, but all-in-all they are quite comparable, and quite remarkable for what they
by jangray 13y ago
I use both vendors' toolsets, have found occasional bugs in both, have my regrets, but all-in-all they are quite comparable, and quite remarkable for what they enable.
In both tools most of my design spins take <3 minutes.
If you were building an ASIC you'd pay $$$,$$$ for such tools. The economics of FPGAs are such that the tools are either free or $,$$$. Both are reasonable and accessible to an enthusiast/practicing EE, respectively.
I am so grateful to Ross Freeman, inventor of FPGAs, and all the engineers that followed in his footsteps, for democratizing access to state of the art high performance digital logic. For $100 or so you can get a 28 nm device filled with 10,000s of LUTs and hundreds of RAM blocks and build whatever you can imagine. Amazing.
- aortega 13y agoIndeed, I always wonder why such a (relatively) exotic and low-volume technology is also very low-cost. 3 minutes is very fast...one of my projects takes about 30 minutes for ~30K Luts on a modern Core I7, I used too many registers. Developing and debugging it is basically torture.