4 ms·

For those who don't have journal access, here's the part that you're probably most interested in: http://imgur.com/xzNwUTL http://imgur.com/xzNwUTL The left co

For those who don't have journal access, here's the part that you're probably most interested in: http://imgur.com/xzNwUTL http://imgur.com/xzNwUTL The left column is the original image. Next to it is a non-neural PCA/Eigenface reconstruction. Next to that are the reconstructions from a variety of brain regions.

sillysaurus3 13y ago
Would someone please upload the PDF for those of us who don't have academic logins? The current state of affairs precludes people from thinking critically. Instead we're forced to take publications at face value.
- icegreentea 13y ago
  I'm away from campus now. I'll post if I remember. But for now, this is one of the investigator's website: http://camplab.psych.yale.edu/papers.html http://camplab.psych.yale.edu/papers.html He seems to have a pretty good track record of posting his papers there. This one isn't up yet (for one thing it isn't really fully published yet). Maybe you can check back later... I know, it's super shitty. I have no idea what I'm going to do when I leave school.
- kevinchen 13y ago
  Here's the PDF. Science publishing sucks. http://cl.ly/3F140E1t0p0j http://cl.ly/3F140E1t0p0j
  - sillysaurus3 13y ago
    You're wonderful! Thank you so much.
kbenson 13y ago
If I'm interpreting the visuals there correctly and some assumptions from it are correct (neither all that likely), it looks like it's fairly accurate at first, and the more images that are shown and reconstructed the more bleed-through of prior images can be sees when reconstructing.
pigDisgusting 13y ago
My god. Those faces are like something out of my worst nightmares.
NoodleIncident 13y ago
The caption for this image seems to indicate that the reconstructed images shown here are averaged over all test subjects; i.e., no one test subject was able to reconstruct the faces as well. There were only six of them, I suppose, but still.

sillysaurus3 13y ago

Would someone please upload the PDF for those of us who don't have academic logins? The current state of affairs precludes people from thinking critically. Instead we're forced to take publications at face value.

icegreentea 13y ago
I'm away from campus now. I'll post if I remember. But for now, this is one of the investigator's website: http://camplab.psych.yale.edu/papers.html http://camplab.psych.yale.edu/papers.html He seems to have a pretty good track record of posting his papers there. This one isn't up yet (for one thing it isn't really fully published yet). Maybe you can check back later... I know, it's super shitty. I have no idea what I'm going to do when I leave school.
kevinchen 13y ago
Here's the PDF. Science publishing sucks. http://cl.ly/3F140E1t0p0j http://cl.ly/3F140E1t0p0j
- sillysaurus3 13y ago
  You're wonderful! Thank you so much.

kbenson 13y ago

If I'm interpreting the visuals there correctly and some assumptions from it are correct (neither all that likely), it looks like it's fairly accurate at first, and the more images that are shown and reconstructed the more bleed-through of prior images can be sees when reconstructing.

pigDisgusting 13y ago

My god. Those faces are like something out of my worst nightmares.

NoodleIncident 13y ago

The caption for this image seems to indicate that the reconstructed images shown here are averaged over all test subjects; i.e., no one test subject was able to reconstruct the faces as well. There were only six of them, I suppose, but still.