2 ms·
Yeah, this is my thought. It seems, for example, that precisely calculating the optimal strategy would be quite tenable on a 9x9 board, because the problem spac
by thinkpad20 13y ago
Yeah, this is my thought. It seems, for example, that precisely calculating the optimal strategy would be quite tenable on a 9x9 board, because the problem space is so small. On a 19x19 board, the space is absolutely immense. It doesn't seem to make a huge difference with humans, though, because we are so adept at pattern-matching. So it seems like while a larger board would certainly make things more difficult to a human, they wouldn't really have to make many adjustments in their fundamental strategy. On the other hand, it could dramatically weaken a computer player.
As to the other point raised, there doesn't seem to be any reason why it would suddenly cease to become Go if you increase the board past 19x19. The rules of Go are independent of board size, and I'm sure it took quite a long time before the "standard sizes" of 9, 13, and 19 were fixed.
- Retric 13y agoSolving go on a 5x5 board takes something like 2hours on a modern PC. So, optimal play for 7x7 may be within reach but 9x9 is much much harder. PS: "Center opening results in Black taking the entire board. First play on the edge results in White taking the entire board."
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- thinkpad20 13y agoInteresting, no idea! Thanks, learned something.